Whether to begin Parkinson’s treatment with the gold-standard levodopa or other therapy (e.g., dopamine agonist, MAO-B inhibitor) is a question debated among neurologists and patients.
A paper published today in The Lancet reports that early treatment of levodopa provides better mobility and quality of life after seven years over early treatment with dopamine agonists or MAO-B inhibitors. In the largest-ever Parkinson’s disease trial — called PD MED — a group of researchers from 80 sites throughout the United Kingdom and led by Dr. Richard Gray of the University of Oxford compared the three therapies in a total of 1,620 newly diagnosed patients, including those with young onset PD.
In a comment also published by The Lancet, Drs. Anthony Lang and Connie Marras (both from the University of Toronto) wrote, “The results of this study will help to persuade physicians and reassure patients that the fears that have served as the groundwork in establishing levodopa phobia — that often results in patients experiencing unnecessary and easily managed disability and reduction in quality of life in the early years of their disease — are unfounded.”
Some physicians are reluctant to begin patients on levodopa due to the earlier onset of levodopa-induced dyskinesia — a side effect of the medication that presents with jerky, fractured movements — and motor fluctuations or “off” episodes.
The PD MED study asked patients to complete a questionnaire on their quality of life relative to their mobility. After three years, patients on levodopa averaged 1.8 points better than patients on dopamine agonists or MAO-B inhibitors, and that beneficial difference remained seven years into the trial.
Dr. Gray was quoted saying, “Although the differences in favour of levodopa are small when you consider the short- and long-term benefits, side-effects, quality of life for patients, and costs, the old drug levodopa is still the best initial treatment strategy for most patients.”
Original Source: Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research